Abstract 99. Jahrestagung der DOG, 29. 9. - 2. 10. 01 im ICC, Berlin

Anmeldung zur Tagung
   Registration
Grußwort
   Invitation
Themen
   Topics
Allgemeiner Ablauf
   General overview
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Kurse
   Courses
Symposien
   Symposiums
Frühstück mit Spezialisten
   Breakfast with specialists
Arzthelferinnen-Fortbildung
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Ausstellerliste
   Exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Teilnahmegebühren
   Registration fees
Impressum



Three-dimensional topographic angiography (TAG) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): a comparison

1Elsner H., 1Niemeyer M., 2Birngruber R., 1Laqua H., 1Schmidt-Erfurth U.

1University Eye Hospital Lübeck, 2Medical Laser Center Lübeck

Objective: To compare three-dimensional topographic angiography (TAG) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) and to characterize their specific capabilities in imaging choroidal neovascularization.
Methods: 30 patients presenting with choroidal neovascularization have been examined by two imaging modalities. Topographic angiography (TAG) was performed, capturing 32 tomographic series of horiziontal cross-sections during a confocal fluorescein- and indocyanin-green angiography and applying a newly developed software for threedimensional data analysis. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) was carried out with a slitlamp-adapted system under ophthalmoscopic control.
Results: Both imaging techniques, TAG and OCT are reliable in detecting the chorioretinal lesion. Localisation and hight of the neovascular complex are identical in both modalities. However, significant differences became apparent in terms of delineation of vascular and extravascular structures. In TAG an isolated documentation of the physiologic surface of the choriocapillaris and neovascular components was possible. Blockage phenomena caused by blood, serous fluid and overlying layers of RPE had no impact on visibility. Localisation of CNV is precise and easily delineated from individually configured extravascular structures. OCT allows no differentiation between (neo-)vascular or avascular tissues. CNV shows up as an unspecific part of a thickening or elevation of the highly reflective layer of RPE and anterior choriocapillaris. CNV-associated phenomena like intra- and subretinal fluid are only detectable by OCT.
Conclusion: The comparison of TAG with an established imaging technique like OCT shows TAG being a realistic method to visualize CNV. The isolated view of CNV is a clear advantage of TAG, while OCT is the better choice to assess CNV-associated intra- and subretinal structural changes.




DOG HomepageZurück / Back