Abstract 99. Jahrestagung der DOG, 29. 9. - 2. 10. 01 im ICC, Berlin

Anmeldung zur Tagung
   Registration
Grußwort
   Invitation
Themen
   Topics
Allgemeiner Ablauf
   General overview
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Kurse
   Courses
Symposien
   Symposiums
Frühstück mit Spezialisten
   Breakfast with specialists
Arzthelferinnen-Fortbildung
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Ausstellerliste
   Exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Teilnahmegebühren
   Registration fees
Impressum



Scotoma classification with artificial neural networks

1Jürgens C., 1Koch T., 2Burth R., 1Zell A., 2Schiefer U.

1Wilhelm-Schickard-Institut für Informatik, Lehrstuhl Rechnerarchitektur, Universität Tübingen, Sand 1, 72076 Tübingen; 2Universitäts-Augenklinik Tübingen, Abt. II Neuroophthalmologie, Schleichstrasse 12-16, 72076 Tübingen

Objective: Developing a computer system for automated scotoma classification using artificial neural networks.
Methods: This study is based on 2337 perimetric test sets of the Tuebingen Automated Perimeter (TAP). All pathologic perimetric test sets (RE: 967; LE: 1012) are classified into 16 scotoma subgroups depending on the type of visual field defect (VFD). The TAP uses a threshold-oriented, slightly supra-liminal strategy, leading to high test point density. The 30° test grid of the central visual field contains 191 test locations with centripetal condensation. The depth of a defect is indicated by 6 different luminance classes. These measured luminance classes are presented to a neural network with 191 input units as input data. The output layer contains a) 2 output units to discriminate normal from pathologic patterns, b) 17 output units, one for each scotoma subgroup plus one additional for normal findings. The corresponding output unit is set to 1, while all others are set to 0. Initially 1337 data sets are used to train the network with the learning algorithm standard-backpropagation. After training the classification accuracy is tested with the remaining 1000 data sets, that are unknown to the network.
Results: We reach a classification accuracy of RE: 99.1%; LE: 99.1% for the discrimination of normal from pathologic patterns. The results for scotoma classification are RE: 95.1%; LE: 96.1%.
Conclusion: Neural networks classify scotoma subgroups with high accuracy >95%. This method may lead to an automated scotoma classification.




DOG HomepageZurück / Back