Abstract 99. Jahrestagung der DOG, 29. 9. - 2. 10. 01 im ICC, Berlin

Anmeldung zur Tagung
   Registration
Grußwort
   Invitation
Themen
   Topics
Allgemeiner Ablauf
   General overview
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Kurse
   Courses
Symposien
   Symposiums
Frühstück mit Spezialisten
   Breakfast with specialists
Arzthelferinnen-Fortbildung
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Ausstellerliste
   Exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Teilnahmegebühren
   Registration fees
Impressum



Comparison-study of Nidek and Humphrey Autorefractor

Martin M., Auffarth G. U.

Universitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120 Heidelberg

Background: Autorefractors are applied for measurement of objective refraction. However measurement is sometimes not possible due to cataract or disturbing light reflexes caused by an intraocular lens. In our study we compared data of the autorefractor Humphrey (Zeiss) with data of the autorefractor Nidek (Nidek). The autorefractor Nidek is equipped with a special IOL-function. When applying this function objective refraction is performed with decreased light intensity, in order to avoid disturbing light reflexes from the intraocular lens.
Methods: 54 eyes of 28 patients were examined by the autorefractor Humphrey and Nidek as well applying the IOL-function of the Nidekautorefractor. Then means, standard mean deviations, range, mean differences and frequency of error were compared.
Results: Means of spheric aequivalents were +0.37 ± 3.65 dpt. (Nidek), +0.25 ± 3.64 dpt. (Nidek IOL-function) and -0.52 ± 3.22 dpt.(Humphrey). Range was -16.75 to +12.38 dpt. (Nidek), -17 to +12.38 dpt. (Nidek IOLfunction) and -15.5 to 11.25 dpt. (Humphrey). The mean differences were between Nidek/Humphrey 0.72 ± 0.99 dpt., between Nidek/Nidek-IOL 0.09 ± 0.35 dpt. and between Nidek-IOL/Humphrey 0.60 ± 1.04 dpt. Range was -1.25 to 4.5 dpt. (Nidek/Humphrey), -0.5 to 1.5 dpt. (Nidek/Nidek-IOL) and - 1.5 to 4.5 dpt (Nidek-IOL/Humphrey). Error in case of impossibility of measurement occured five times (Nidek), two times (Nidek IOL-function) and two times (Humphrey).
Conclusion: Our study showed differences of refraction data between the two autorefractors when examining the same eye at one time. The IOLfunction of the autorefractor Nidek was efficient in order to reduce frequency of error due to light reflexes caused by pseudophacic eyes.




DOG HomepageZurück / Back