Abstract 99. Jahrestagung der DOG, 29. 9. - 2. 10. 01 im ICC, Berlin

Anmeldung zur Tagung
   Registration
Grußwort
   Invitation
Themen
   Topics
Allgemeiner Ablauf
   General overview
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Kurse
   Courses
Symposien
   Symposiums
Frühstück mit Spezialisten
   Breakfast with specialists
Arzthelferinnen-Fortbildung
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Ausstellerliste
   Exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Teilnahmegebühren
   Registration fees
Impressum



Predictability of auto-refractometry after LASIK

Mirshahi A., Gerhardt D., Bühren J., Wellermann G., Kohnen T.

University Eye Clinic Frankfurt/Main

Automated refractometry (AR) is a useful tool for determination of subjective refraction. However it seems to be less reliable after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) than preoperatively. Aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AR after LASIK considering different central laser treatment zones (optical zone).
Methods: Results of 95 consecutive LASIK operations (57 patients, mean age: 37 years, myopic and myopic astigmatism) were evaluated retrospectively. The operation was performed using a scanning spot excimer laser (Technolas C-LASIK 217) and HansatomeTM microkeratome. Four groups were evaluated: a) optical zone between 5 - 5.5, b) 5.6 - 6, c) 6.1 - 6.5, d) 6.6 - 7 mm. Pre- and postoperative subjective and automated refraction data (Topcon RM-A2300) were compared.
Results: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) of autorefractometry was -6.76 D (±2.65), mean preoperative subjective refraction (SE) was -6.9 D (±2.71), [rpre=0.99, rpost1=0.78, rpost12=0.7]. The difference between the objective (AR) and subjective refraction was calculated (SE, average): preoperatively all: 0.14 D (±0.41), 1 month postoperatively -0.18 D (±0.58), 12 months postoperatively -0.35 D (±0.59).
Group results:
a) preop 0.18 (±0.6), post 1 mo -0.68 (±0.51), post 12 mo -0.7 (±0.62),
b) preop 0.16 (±0.39), post 1 mo -0.26 (±0.51), post 12 mo -0.6 (±0.46),
c) preop 0.12 (±0.33), post 1 mo 0.07 (±0.53), post 12 mo -0.2 (±0.49),
d) preop 0.08 (±0.32), post 1 mo 0.17 (±0.41), post 12 mo 0.32 (±0.4).
Conclusion: Generally auto-refractometry results after LASIK are not as accurate as preoperatively. If the optical zone is lower than 6.1 mm the device underestimates the subjective refraction (more myopic values). The smaller the optical zone, the higher it underestimates. In the case when the optical zone is higher than 6.5 mm the autorefractomter overestimates the true refraction (more hyperopic values).




DOG HomepageZurück / Back