Abstract 99. Jahrestagung der DOG, 29. 9. - 2. 10. 01 im ICC, Berlin

Anmeldung zur Tagung
   Registration
Grußwort
   Invitation
Themen
   Topics
Allgemeiner Ablauf
   General overview
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Kurse
   Courses
Symposien
   Symposiums
Frühstück mit Spezialisten
   Breakfast with specialists
Arzthelferinnen-Fortbildung
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Ausstellerliste
   Exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Teilnahmegebühren
   Registration fees
Impressum



Quality of life in patients undergoing cataract surgery in their first eye - evaluation with the SF-36-test -

1Reichelt J. A., 1Kovács N., 2Handschuh T., 2Siebmann J. U., 2Küchler T.

1Univ.-Augenklinik, Hegewischstr. 2, D-24105 Kiel, 2Referenzzentrum Lebensqualität i. d. Onkologie, Arnold-Heller-Str. 7, D-24105 Kiel

Objective: In cataract surgery the patients´ quality of life (QL) gains importance in terms of visual function and ocular findings. It must be asked which aspects in QL are concerned by ocular disease and its therapy. Reliability and validity in the evaluation of patients´ QL is essential. In principal the question arises if amelioration in QL is possible through cataract surgery.
Methods: The 36-item short-form survey (SF-36) is an internationally standardized instrument in order to evaluate QL. This is also valid as far as the german version is concerned: Representative data for the german population are available. The test consists of 36 questions about the two categories of physical and mental health. Each category is devided into 4 subgroups. The results in each subtest lead to a score between 0 and 100. A high score indicates a good QL. In our study we handed over the SF-36 to 101 patients the day before cataract surgery. 93 of these filled in the forms. Further interviews with the same questions follow 2 and 6 months postoperatively.
Results: Before cataract surgery patients under 70 years (n = 29) tended to have a lower score in physical health in comparison to the reference population. These results were not significant (p-values of the subgroups: 0.056; 0.061; 0.275; 0.548). In mental health, however, these patients were signifcantly worse in parts (p: 0.006; 0.048; 0.059; 0.408). In patients over 70 years (n=64) physical health showed a lower level in all subgroups (p: 0,002; 0,004; 0,009; 0,012). Mental health was also partly worse in comparison with a representative population of the same age (p: 0,001; 0,011; 0,099; 0,142).
Conclusion: A possible reason for comparative low patients´ QL in our clinic before cataract surgery could be their cataract itself. On the other hand it seems possible that special selection of patients in a university eye clinic mirrors low QL scores. This question and the question to which extent cataract surgery has an influence on QL will be answered when still missing question forms will be returned.




DOG HomepageZurück / Back