Abstract 99. Jahrestagung der DOG, 29. 9. - 2. 10. 01 im ICC, Berlin

Anmeldung zur Tagung
   Registration
Grußwort
   Invitation
Themen
   Topics
Allgemeiner Ablauf
   General overview
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Kurse
   Courses
Symposien
   Symposiums
Frühstück mit Spezialisten
   Breakfast with specialists
Arzthelferinnen-Fortbildung
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Ausstellerliste
   Exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Teilnahmegebühren
   Registration fees
Impressum



Endophthalmitis: Visual outcome in relation to therapy und etiology

Schebitz K., Mino de Kaspar H., Grasbon T., Schaumberger M., Kampik A.

Dept. of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336 Munich, Germany

Objective: Endophthalmitis is one of the most complicated ocular diseases. For successful treatment, a rapid and reliable microbiologic analysis is required.
Methods: From 1990-1997, in 120 cases of endophthalmitis the visual outcome was analyzed with regard to the applied therapy and the etiology (nosocomial: n=79, posttraumatic: n=20, endogenous: n=21). Treatment alternatives were: 1.) Immediate pars plana-vitrectomy (ppV) with intraocular and systemic antibiotics (n=73). 2.) Delayed (up to 8 days after diagnosis) ppV with systemic and partly intraocular antibiotics (n=11). 3.) Systemic antibiotic therapy alone without ppV (n=24). A rapid microbiologic analysis with microscopy and direct susceptibility testing of the ocular specimens was performed. The change of the visual acuity from the timepoint of initiation of therapy to 4-6 weeks thereafter was assessed and compared in between the three therapeutic groups.
Results: In therapy group 1, the median visual acuity improved 3 lines (median/interquartile range: 3/9,5). In group 2 and 3, the median visual acuity did not change between the two timepoints (group 2: 0/7.0; group 3: 0/6.0). In the etiologic groups 4-6 weeks after initiation of therapy, the median visual acuity was 0.05 (range: PL-0.8) for nosocomial, 0.1 (PL-0.5) for posttraumatic and 0.03 (HM-0.6) for endogenous endophthalmitis. In endogenous endophthalmitis, 4 eyes were enucleated, in nosocomial endophthalmitis 5 eyes, and in posttraumatic endophthalmitis 3 eyes.
Conclusion: In endophthalmitis, rapid surgical intervention with the advantage of an early microbiologic diagnosis seems to improve the visual outcome. The most favorable visual prognosis was found in cases of posttraumatic endophthalmitis, the worst in endogenous endophthalmitis. The enucleation rate was lowest for nosocomial endophthalmitis.




DOG HomepageZurück / Back