Programm & Abstracts                 "Innovationen in der Augenheilkunde"

Aktuelle Tagungsinformationen
   News and Updates

Anmeldung zur Tagung
   Registration
Hotelbuchung
   Hotel Registration
Grußwort
   Welcome address
Beteiligte Gesellschaften
   Societies involved
Eröffnung des Kongresses
   Opening Ceremony
Preise
   Awards
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Posterpräsentationen
   Poster Presentation
Kurse
   Courses
Begleitende Veranstaltungen
   Collateral Events
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
Jubiläumsparty
   Jubilee Party
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Ausstellerliste
   Exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Teilnahmegebühren
   Registration fees
Impressum



DOG Homepage

Systemic Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) as Immuno-prophylaxis in Allogeneic High-risk Penetrating Keratoplasty: First Results of a Randomized Multi-center trial

1Mayweg S., 1Sokolowska Y., 2Seitz B., 3Engelmann K., 4Mittelviefhaus H., 1Reinhard T.,
1Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitäts-Augenklinik (Düsseldorf)
2Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Augenklinik (Erlangen)
3Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde (Hamburg)
4Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Augenklinik (Freiburg)

Background: Recently, we were able to demonstrate the effecacy and safety of MMF after penetrating high-risk keratoplasty in a randomised monocenter study. Here, first results of a randomised multicenter trial are presented.
Patients: Seventy-one of 140 high-risk penetrating keratoplasty patients have already been randomised into the 2 study groups: 39 into the MMF-group and 32 into the control group. All 71 patients received fluocortolon 1mg/kg bw/day, tapered within the first 3 postoperative weeks, and topical prednisolone acetate 5x/day for 5 months. In the MMF-group MMF was administered in a daily dose of 2x1000 mg for the first 6 postoperative months.
Results: Within the follow up of 8,2 ±6,6 months 2 patients of the MMF-group developed reversible endothelial immune reactions after cessation of MMF-application, in contrast to 3 reversible and 3 irreversible immune reactions in the control group. According to Kaplan and Meier 95% of the grafts were free from immune reactions one year postoperatively in the MMF-group, in contrast to only 73% in the control group. This difference, however, was not yet statistically significant (p=0.1; log-rank-test). All side-effects were reversible up to now.
Conclusions: Systemic MMF might turn out to become an effective and safe armament in the prophylaxis of immune reactions after penetrating high-risk keratoplasty.

Zurück/Back