Programm & Abstracts                 "Innovationen in der Augenheilkunde"

Aktuelle Tagungsinformationen
   News and Updates

Anmeldung zur Tagung
   Registration
Hotelbuchung
   Hotel Registration
Grußwort
   Welcome address
Beteiligte Gesellschaften
   Societies involved
Eröffnung des Kongresses
   Opening Ceremony
Preise
   Awards
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Posterpräsentationen
   Poster Presentation
Kurse
   Courses
Begleitende Veranstaltungen
   Collateral Events
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
Jubiläumsparty
   Jubilee Party
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Ausstellerliste
   Exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Teilnahmegebühren
   Registration fees
Impressum



DOG Homepage

Diagnostic Biopsy of Iris Tumours with the Vitrectomy Cutter: Preliminary Results

1Anastassiou G., 1Schueler A., 2Dirsch O., 1Schilling H., 3Steuhl K. P., 4Bornfeld N.,
1Universität-Gesamthochschule Essen, Zentrum für Augenheilkunde (Essen)
2Universität-Gesamthochschule Essen, Institut für Pathologie (Essen)
3Universität-Gesamthochschule Essen, Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Abt. für Erkrankungen des vorderen Augenabschnitts (Essen)
4Universität-Gesamthochschule Essen, Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Abt. Hinterer Augenabschnitt (Essen)

Purpose: Tumours of the iris often present a diagnostic dilemma. In those cases a biopsy may be an alternative to clinical control. The most common procedure for biopsy is the iridectomy. Disadvantages of this method are the occurrence of a polycoria with monocular diplopia and the theoretical possibility of dissemination of malignant cells by the surgical manipulation. We present our initial experience with a novel method of biopsy.
Method: Twenty biopsies were performed with a standard vitrectomy cutter via a paracenthesis of the anterior chamber in 19 patients with suspected tumours of the iris. The biopsy material underwent cytological and/or histological examination.
Results: In 17 cases (85%) the material was sufficient for further examination. Cytology was performed in 15 cases (88.2%), whereas histology was possible in 6 biopsies (35.3%). An immunohistochemical examination was done in 3 cases (17.6%). In 13 out of 20 biopsies (65%) the result of the cyto-/histological examination was informative. The main complication during surgery was bleeding from the tumour (63.2%). Only in one case further surgical manipulation due to anterior chamber bleeding two days after the biopsy was necessary. A substantial defect of the iris did not occur in any case. The intraocular pressure raised to more than 30 mmHg in 6 patients at day 1 after the biopsy. Late onset side effects were not seen so far. The mean follow-up time is 7.3 months.
Conclusions: Biopsy of iris tumours with the vitrectomy cutter is a safe and gentle procedure. In the majority of the examined specimens (65%) the result of the cyto-/histological examination was informative and determined the further management of the patients.

Zurück/Back