Programm & Abstracts                 "Innovationen in der Augenheilkunde"

Aktuelle Tagungsinformationen
   News and Updates

Anmeldung zur Tagung
   Registration
Hotelbuchung
   Hotel Registration
Grußwort
   Welcome address
Beteiligte Gesellschaften
   Societies involved
Eröffnung des Kongresses
   Opening Ceremony
Preise
   Awards
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Posterpräsentationen
   Poster Presentation
Kurse
   Courses
Begleitende Veranstaltungen
   Collateral Events
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
Jubiläumsparty
   Jubilee Party
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Ausstellerliste
   Exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Teilnahmegebühren
   Registration fees
Impressum



DOG Homepage

Influence of Cut-off Filters on Reading-behavior in Age-related Macular Degeneration

1Rohrschneider K., 2Stritzke M., 2Ziese D., 2Bayer Y.,
1Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Universitäts-Augenklinik (Heidelberg)
2Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Universitäts-Augenklinik, Ophthalmologische Rehabilitation (Heidelberg)

Background: Cut-off filters may result in improved contrast sensitivity in different retinal dystrophies and therefore lead to improved visual function. Recently, it has been postulated that a cut-off filter at 540 nm might improve vision in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We investigated whether cut-off filters result in improved reading ability.
Methods: Reading performance was examined in 22 patients with AMD aged 63 to 91 years (Visual Acuity 0.125-0.4) using the Radner reading charts. These charts were presented in random order either with or without cut-off filters Zeiss CF 540 and CF 580 monocularly to the better eye using a defined illumination of 105 cd/m2.
Results: Using the CF 540 cut-off filter 11 patients improved for 1 line while 11 decreased compared to reading without filters. Calculating the LogRAD-Score, which takes reading errors into account, 3 patients improved who had less reading errors. Seven patients subjectively preferred reading with CF 540 while 1 was really upset. Reading speed improved in 9 patients while it decreased in 13, however all changes were minimal. There was no improvement using CF 580.
Conclusions: Overall, we fvound no measureable improvement using the CF 540 cut-off filter. Even the subjective impression was positive only in few patients. Cut-off filter 580, which was tested for comparison does not show any advantage. In summarization cut-off filters do not improve reading behaviour in age-related macular degeneration.

Zurück/Back