Programm & Abstracts                 "Innovationen in der Augenheilkunde"

Aktuelle Tagungsinformationen
   News and Updates

Anmeldung zur Tagung
   Registration
Hotelbuchung
   Hotel Registration
Grußwort
   Welcome address
Beteiligte Gesellschaften
   Societies involved
Eröffnung des Kongresses
   Opening Ceremony
Preise
   Awards
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Posterpräsentationen
   Poster Presentation
Kurse
   Courses
Begleitende Veranstaltungen
   Collateral Events
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
Jubiläumsparty
   Jubilee Party
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Ausstellerliste
   Exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Teilnahmegebühren
   Registration fees
Impressum



DOG Homepage

Multifocal Electroretinography: Comparison of Repeatability between Monitor- and LED-Stimulation

Mazinani B. A. E., Amjadi A., Weinberger A. W. A., Schrage N. F.,
RWTH Aachen, Universitätsaugenklinik (Aachen)

Purpose: LED-stimulation with cyclic summation in MF-ERG provides a similar topographical analysis of retinal function compared to monitor-stimulation with significantly lower examination times. Purpose of this study is to show wether the new examination method has also a comparable repeatability to conventional stimulation.
Method: Seven healthy subjects were examined at two appointments at an interval of at least 3 weeks by monitor- and LED-stimulation with a resolution of 61 areas (RETIscan, Roland Consult, Wiesbaden). In LED stimulation with cyclic summation, each array of the stimulation pattern is triggered with a slightly different amplitude of about 30 Hz. After the recording, the curves of the single areas can be traced back according to the principles of a Fourier analysis. An examination of an area of 30° with a resolution of 61 hexagons takes about 32 sec. An examination using monitor-stimulation and M-sequences takes at least 4 min with the same resolution.
Results: Repeatability was calculated using coefficients of variation. Both methods came to coefficients of under 10% for the latency of the b-wave and under 20% for the amplitude of the b-wave with a slightly better intraindividual stability of the latencies in LED-stimulation, whereas the monitor stimulation showed slightly lower coefficients of the amplitudes.
Conclusions: The significantly shorter examination time in cyclic summation leads to a considerable relief for the patient and the examiner. This study shows that these shorter examination times are not accompanied by a loss of intraindividual examination stability.

Zurück/Back