Programm & Abstracts                 "Innovationen in der Augenheilkunde"

Aktuelle Tagungsinformationen
   News and Updates

Anmeldung zur Tagung
   Registration
Hotelbuchung
   Hotel Registration
Grußwort
   Welcome address
Beteiligte Gesellschaften
   Societies involved
Eröffnung des Kongresses
   Opening Ceremony
Preise
   Awards
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Posterpräsentationen
   Poster Presentation
Kurse
   Courses
Begleitende Veranstaltungen
   Collateral Events
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
Jubiläumsparty
   Jubilee Party
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Ausstellerliste
   Exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Teilnahmegebühren
   Registration fees
Impressum



DOG Homepage

Permanen Corneal Ring in Penetrating Keratoplasty

1Krumeich J. H., 2Duncker G. I. W., 3Uthoff D.,
1Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Augenabteilung (Bochum)
2Martin-Luther-Universität, Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde (Halle/Saale)
3Augenklinik Kiel-Bellevue (Kiel)

Purpose: Stabilization of postoperative refraction. Transducing vectors on the ring should allow better wound adaptation and button protection in particular in peripherally vascularized corneas or triple procedures.
Method: A 15/100 mm (±1/100) x 7,95/8,10 mm ring made of Cobalt/Titanium/ Molybdenum alloy was sutured into PKP wound. 110 consecutive cases (GR I) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were compared to an identical control group without ring (GR II).
Results: Postop cylinder was – 2,5 D (GR I) to 2.9 D (GR II). BCVA was 0.45 after 6 months and 0.6 after one year in both groups. In GR I sphere and cylinder remained the same whereas all values including axes changed in GR II. Endothelial cellcounts after one year were 1780 cells/qmm in GR I versus 1650 cells /qmm in Gr. II. Ingrowing vessels deviated frequently at ring level. Sutures if pulling through could be removed in ring cases 4 months postoperatively with no visible disadvantage. There was one immune reaction after one year (0.9%) in group I compared to 7 (6,5%) in group II.
Conclusion: Corneal ring seems to accelerate healing, may reduce immune reaction, and may act as a barrier to vessels. Astigmatism or postoperative visual acuity seem little influenced. Refraction in the postop course is more stable in the ring group. Endothelial cell count was statistically not significantly different after one year.

Zurück/Back