Programm                 "Degeneration und Regeneration– Grundlagen, Diagnostik und Therapie"


Hotelbuchung
   Hotel Registration
Grußwort
   Welcome address
Beteiligte Gesellschaften
   Societies involved
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Eröffnung des Kongresses
   Opening Ceremony
Preise
   Awards
Ablauf der Tagung 2003
   General overview of congress
Lageplan der Räumlichkeiten
   Map of Congress Center
Wissenschaftliche Themen
   Scientific topics
Symposien
   Symposia
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Posterpräsentationen
   Poster Presentation
Kurse
   Courses
Begleitende Veranstaltungen
   Accompanying program
Arbeitssitzungen
   Working sessions
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Industrieaussteller
   Commercial exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Impressum



DOG Homepage


Abstract
Abstract

Results after Advancement of Tenotomized or Recessed Medial Rectus Muscles in Patients with Consecutive Exotropia

Steffen H., Kolling G.H.
Dept. of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg

Purpose: Is the advancement of a tenotomized or recessed medial rectus muscle a dosable operative procedure?
Method: Retrospective trial performed on 20 patients after tenotomie (group 1) or 20 patients after recession of the medial rectus muscle (group 2). For every 2° of deviation the medial rectus muscle was advanced for one millimeter. Distant and near angles were assessed three days and three months postoperatively as was the motility of the eyes. Simultaneous perception was present only in 2 of 40 patients.
Results: In group 1 and group 2 preoperative distant angles were XT14° and XT25° respectively. Postoperative distant angles were measured with ET 1,5° and XT1° in group 1 and group 2 respectively three days postoperatively. After three months, the angles changed to XT6° (group 1) and XT7,5° (group 2) with a standard deviation ranging from 4.7° to 5.7° in both groups. The operative effect (in ° of corrected angle/mm of operated muscle) was calculated with 2.1 in group 1 and 1.9 in group 2 respectively 3 days postoperatively. Three months postoperatively the operative effect had decreased to 1.1 and 1.4 in group 1 and group 2 respectively. Adduction improved in average by 12° and 17,5° in group 1 and group 2 respectively.
Conclusions: With an amount of operation of 2° per mm no overcorrection should be present three days postoperatively. However, three months po


Zurück | Back