Programm                 "Degeneration und Regeneration– Grundlagen, Diagnostik und Therapie"


Hotelbuchung
   Hotel Registration
Grußwort
   Welcome address
Beteiligte Gesellschaften
   Societies involved
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Eröffnung des Kongresses
   Opening Ceremony
Preise
   Awards
Ablauf der Tagung 2003
   General overview of congress
Lageplan der Räumlichkeiten
   Map of Congress Center
Wissenschaftliche Themen
   Scientific topics
Symposien
   Symposia
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Posterpräsentationen
   Poster Presentation
Kurse
   Courses
Begleitende Veranstaltungen
   Accompanying program
Arbeitssitzungen
   Working sessions
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Industrieaussteller
   Commercial exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Impressum



DOG Homepage


Abstract
Abstract

Retinal Thickness in Diabetic Retinopathy – A Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography, the Retinal Thickness Analyser and Fundus Photography

Goebel W., Franke R.
Dept. of Ophthalmology, University of Wuerzburg

Purpose: To compare retinal thickness in diabetic patients measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and the new Retinal Thickness Analyser (RTA).
Method: The macula of 20 eyes from 10 patients with diabetes mellitus was examined with OCT and RTA. Mesurements of retinal thickness were compared with signs of macular edema in stereo fundus photography. For each eye, 9 different sectors were analysed (foveal sector, 4 parafoveal sectors, 4 extrafoveal sectors).
Results: 10 of the 20 eyes showed signs of macular edema in fundus photography. Mean retinal thickness of the foveal sector was 210±76µm in RTA and 276±111µm in OCT measurements. There was a good overall correlation between OCT and RTA (r=0.72). The correlation was best in the foveal (r=0.88) and the parafoveal sectors (r=0.78).
Conclusions: Both measuring techniques yield similar results when examining eyes of patients with diabetes although absolute values differ. The RTA seems to be more prone to erroneous or missing thickness readings under difficult measuring conditions (cataract, floaters, retinal hemorrhages and exsudates).


Zurück | Back