Programm                 "Degeneration und Regeneration– Grundlagen, Diagnostik und Therapie"


Hotelbuchung
   Hotel Registration
Grußwort
   Welcome address
Beteiligte Gesellschaften
   Societies involved
DOG Information
   DOG Information
Eröffnung des Kongresses
   Opening Ceremony
Preise
   Awards
Ablauf der Tagung 2003
   General overview of congress
Lageplan der Räumlichkeiten
   Map of Congress Center
Wissenschaftliche Themen
   Scientific topics
Symposien
   Symposia
Wissenschaftliches Programm
   Scientific program
Posterpräsentationen
   Poster Presentation
Kurse
   Courses
Begleitende Veranstaltungen
   Accompanying program
Arbeitssitzungen
   Working sessions
Rahmenprogramm
   Social program
Allgemeine Informationen
   General Information
Autorenindex
   Index of Authors
Industrieaussteller
   Commercial exhibitors
Sponsoren
   Sponsors
Impressum



DOG Homepage


Abstract
Abstract

Guided Trephine System and Laser Trephination, Comparison of Technical Settings and Clinical Outcomes

Schöner P., Krumeich J. H., Knülle A., Theilen H.
Klinik Krumeich, Bochum

Purpose: Comparison of physical, clinical and economical parameter between Excimer Laser and mechanically cut perforating keratoplasties with the Guided Trephine. Intended to show advantages and disadvantages of the respective method.
Method: Dimensions of donor button and recipient’s opening, angle of undercut are examined with the shadow comparison method. Completeness of trephination, time and costs of instrumentation are compared. Visual recovery, astigmatism before and after suture removal with either method is evaluated on 50 consecutive keratoconus cases.
Results: Angle of undercut with the GTS is dependent on the obturator radius and equal on both donor and recipient. Laser undercut is dependent on the pre-existing corneal radii and may be different at the anterior chamber and recipient site. Trephination is perforating 360° with the GTS, about 15° with the laser. Completion of this cut is performed with Vannas scissors. Time for donor and recipient trephination is 8 min with the GTS, about 20 min with the laser. Costs of instrumentation is about 1:10. Visual recovery for the means of both procedures is after 1 month 20/50, 3 months 20/35, 6 months 20/25. Astigmatism is both after 3 months and 6 months 2,7 D for the GTS measured by K-readings and subjectively, about 3 D for the laser means. After suture removal 1 year postoperatively neither method shows significant increase of


Zurück | Back